Singapore moving toward future with artificial intelligence in schools

Authorities in Singapore have announced plans to start developing artificial intelligence (AI) tools for use in schools as part of their FutureSchools@Singapore project. The tools are intended to engage learners in evolving discussions on specific school subjects – in particular science and English literature, to begin with. Instructors will be able to access data collected through learners’ interactions with the AI tools to assess their learning needs. This is an interesting demonstration of how educators in Singapore are increasing their future-orientations.

Continue reading

Posted in Development, Education, ICTs, Information Society, Knowledge development, Leapfrogging development, Technology foresight | 1 Comment

Ingress: Google shows us how to do augmented reality.

Google has made available their new massive multiplayer augmented reality game Ingress. The game uses augmented reality technology to situate the game play in the real world. As Devin Coldewey at NBC News says, “‘Ingress’ has biggest map ever: The real world.” The game uses GPS and other smartphone technologies to generate portals at various locations in the real world, especially significant landmarks, public art or buildings. Two factions within the game, the “Enlightened” and the “Resistance” battle for control over these portals. The game’s website has some cryptic clues relating to the game. Current players have also set up a wiki for the game with more equally cryptic clues. Continue reading

Posted in Education, ICTs, Internet, Technology foresight, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Getting from foresight to policy: The critical role of organizations and social entities

I recently posted an article where I was looking to identify gaps in our knowledge about how foresight programs inform policy and decision-making. Since then, I’ve come across recent research which looks at these gaps in more detail. In particular, a recent paper published by Schartinger, Wilhelmer, Holste & Kubeczko, titled “Assessing immediate learning impacts of large foresight processes”, takes a systematic look at what happens at certain stages during and following the implementation of foresight programs. Despite some weaknesses in their paper, Schartinger et al. make very interesting points concerning the “intermediate” outcomes of foresight programs, i.e. the “knowledge gap” that I’ve pointed out previously, suggesting that we need to look more closely at organizational change in this regard (this is where I was moving before I came across this article so it’s partly that I’m happy to see more movement in this direction). In this article I want to address some of the weaknesses and then hone in on how we address the knowledge gap about intermediate outcomes of foresight programs. Continue reading

Posted in Education, ICTs, Information Society, Knowledge development, Leapfrogging development, Technology foresight, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The “Science Fair” is dead! Long live the “Innovation Fair”!

The “Science Fair” is an age old institution, at least in US schools. Science Fairs can be a lot of fun and they have the potential to engage students while introducing them to research methods and the importance of science. But, they’ve become rather staid. It’s the same old experiments over and over again. It’s such a standardized format by now that if a student is stumped for ideas, she can go to the web and simply google “science fair projects” and get step-by-step instructions for a range of projects. The few really challenging projects tend to be more the product of parents than students (I’ve judged at my daughters’ science fair and, believe me overly involved parents, you’re not fooling anyone). What’s missing from all of this is the creative aspect of science; discovering new real-world problems that need to be solved and formulating solutions to them through the use of the scientific method. Some schools are adopting an alternative to the “Science Fair” and, instead, conducting “Innovation Fairs” which engage the students in the exploration of solutions to real problems, big and small, focusing on fostering young people’s natural inclination toward creativity and experimentation. Continue reading

Posted in Education, Knowledge development, Leapfrogging development, Technology foresight | 1 Comment

What does Klout measure: social influence or size of ego?

Early this past summer I read about someone who had flunked out of a job interview because his Klout.com score wasn’t high enough (and here’s one about a teacher using Klout in a course). It was the first that I had heard about Klout and decided to check it out. Klout claims to provide “a representation of your overall social media influence” based on “more than 400 variables on multiple social networks beyond your number of followers and friends.” What I found was that Klout has little to do with measuring one’s social influence and more to do with stroking one’s ego. But, maybe that’s precisely what social media is about for a lot of people – less about influencing others and more about influencing our own perceptions of our self-worth. Whatever the case, my conclusion was that Klout provides no meaningful measure of what I wanted to know about my social influence. Au contraire, I think it’s more a measure of how much I let social media noise influence me. Here’s how I came to that conclusion… Continue reading

Posted in Information Society, Internet, Knowledge development | Leave a comment

Strategic ambiguity in Finnish policy on technology in education

I teleported (or “jaunted” as Alfred Bester would have it) to Iceland yesterday morning to deliver a presentation at the University of Iceland’s yearly conference on educational research and development. In my presentation I described some of my research on educational policy in Finland, in particular, policy regarding information and communication technologies in education. In this research I explored “strategic ambiguity” in Finnish policy communications to allow for, and promote, diverse interpretations of policy to fit specific contexts and deal with rapid change. I find this a very interesting phenomenon because it goes against conventional thinking that policy should be clear, concise, and uniformly measurable.

I’ve included both a recording of the presentation (in English – requires Flash) and a link to the presentation slides. I ended up running over my time limit because I was trying to be mindful of the need to speak more clearly and slowly than I usually would to accommodate the international audience. So, I didn’t manage to speak directly to all of the slides but readers can see those in the presentation that I’ve shared below. If anyone has questions about those feel free to contact me at tryggvi@education4site.org or to post in the comments. Continue reading

Posted in Education, ICTs, Information Society, Knowledge development, Technology foresight | Leave a comment