Report on information access

World Information Access Project – 2006 Briefing BookletSee also the main web site here.
This report is based on existing data from a variety of sources, so don’t expect anything too earth shattering. I think some of the assumption might be stretching it a bit. For instance, finding #4 of the five that are mentioned concludes that “developing countries – especially countries in Latin America – are putting more cultural content online than they are pouring into books.” As far as I can tell, the internet part of this claim is based entirely on the number of web hosts in each country. Going from there to cultural content seems a bit of a leap to me.

Posted in Development, ICTs, Information Society, Internet | Leave a comment

ICTs, the Millennium Declaration and the knowledge-based economy

It’s Sunday – time for a big post! A few days ago I posted a couple of things about Negroponte’s $100 laptop. One of the things that I mentioned was the common criticism, which extends to ICTs for development in general, that there are more pressing problems in developing countries than the lack of ICTs. This got me thinking about how we justify the ICT4D agenda and sent me back to the Millennium Declaration in a quest for answers. What follows is a fairly lengthy analysis of the Millennium Declaration, what it says about ICTs for development and how this relates to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). What it boils down to is that the Millennium Declaration and the MDGs do make it clear that ICTs should be leveraged in whatever way possible to facilitate development efforts. But, to get a complete picture of how they are to do this and what are the intended outcomes, we have to look beyond both the Millennium Declaration and the MDGs. Click below to read on…

Continue reading

Posted in Development, Education, ICTs, Information Society, Internet, Knowledge development, Leapfrogging development | Leave a comment

Interview with Tim Berners-Lee, who first created the web

A recent interview with Tim Berners-Lee: Isn’t it semantic? : Articles : Internet : BCS.
There are some interesting points there, but the real significant stuff is towards the end, about the “Semantic Web”. People familiar with Berners-Lee’s Book, Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web, will know that this has been his pet project for many years now. I think that for the development community it’s an especially important project. If things work out as planned, the development of the semantic web and web savvy ontologies will make it possible to tie together, by various levels of association, a wide range of electronic resources, no matter what the language or context. For example, this could increase the accessibility of indigenous knowledge. It could also increase researchers’ accessibility to resource from other fields, where a different terminology may be used to describe similar things. Lots of potential, lots of uses.

Posted in Internet | Leave a comment

Encyclopaedia Brittanica rejects Nature’s evaluation of Wikipedia and Brittanica

I posted on the original study, so I figure I have to post on the follow-up: BBC NEWS | Technology | Wikipedia study ‘fatally flawed’.
Encyclopaedia Brittanica has posted a rejection of Nature’s evaluation of Brittanica and Wikipedia, calling for a retraction of the original article. Nature has rejected Brittanica’s rejection and says that they will not retract.
And I ask, but which one is more of a knowledge development tool? (Hint: I think transparency is necessary for the knowledge development process.) Evaluating something like Wikipedia based solely on content sort of misses the point, in my view.

Posted in ICTs, Information Society, Internet, Knowledge development | Leave a comment

Wikis and collaborative development

An interesting interview with Ward Cunningham, creator of the wiki: Father of Wiki Speaks Out on Community and Collaborative Development
“I think of software being a work—very much like a wiki being a work—where people see an area that’s weak and they make it stronger,” Cunningham said.
… and the more people with more diverse origins reveal more weaknesses and make things even stronger. (Did I mention that I like wikis?)

Posted in ICTs, Knowledge development | 1 Comment

Uganda ripe for ICTs

I watched a short version of the film, “Uganda: Education Reforms“, in one of my courses yesterday. I don’t doubt that there is an element of propaganda in the USAID produced film, but I was very impressed with the Ugandan reforms presented. Not surprisingly (and not unjustly), Uganda is something of a “darling child” in development education circles.
One of the things that really impressed me is the provisions for continuing training of teachers. As part of the “Teacher Development Management System” (TDMS), tutors travel throughout Uganda disseminating information about developments in pedagogy and education and encourage teachers to be creative in their approaches. Furthermore, the call for creativity is passed on to the students, with teachers actively encouraged to promote independent and creative thinking among their students.
What this all amounts to, at least as it was presented in the film, is the cultivation of a mentality about education and learning that is intended to reach all levels of society, from the teachers to the parents and to the students. What kept coming to my mind while I watched the film was, with the Ugandan vision and approach regarding education, imagine what they could do if they had good ICTs? And what made this question so persistent in my mind was that they seem to have largely cultivated the type of collaborative knowledge development and dissemination strategies that are so often associated with ICTs without having broad access to ICTs.
One of the things I’ve thought about is whether ICTs are a necessary prerequisite to the type of knowledge development activity that we associate with ICTs because, when talking about ICT4D, one often hears things like, “What are people going to do with ICTs when they’ve never sat in front of a computer before?” What the Ugandan example suggests to me, is that there are ways, and in fact concrete examples of, ways to promote strategies that will make ICTs, once they are available, a relatively seamless addition to ways of doing things, rather than a scary new paradigm (which is questionable whether they really ever are, but that’s a different topic).

Posted in Development, Education, ICTs | Leave a comment